American Forests

Best of American Forests

Home/A Call For Backyard Biodiversity

A Call For Backyard Biodiversity

Common suburban landscapes consist of manicured lawns and nonnative ornamental plants, which provide little nourishment to local fauna.

Acclaimed author and ecologist Douglas Tallamy explains the reasons behind the decline of native flora and fauna, and how we can work to reverse it from our own backyards.
Photos and story by Douglas Tallamy

You have probably never thought of your property as a wildlife preserve representing the last chance we have to sustain plants and animals that were once common throughout the US. But that is exactly the role our suburban and urban landscapes are now playing – and will play even more in the near future.

If this is news to you, it’s not your fault. We were taught from childhood that the plantings in our yards are made mostly for beauty; they allow and encourage us to express our artistic talents, to have fun, and to relax. And whether we like it or not, the way we landscape our properties is seen by our neighbors as a statement of our wealth and social status.

But no one has taught us that we have forced the plants and animals that evolved in North America (our nation’s biodiversity) to depend more and more on human-dominated landscapes for their continued existence. We have always thought that biodiversity was “happy somewhere out there in nature”: in our local woodlot, or perhaps our state and national parks. We have heard nothing about the rate at which species are disappearing from our neighborhoods, towns, counties, and states. Even worse, we have never been taught how vital biodiversity is for our own well-being.

We Have Taken It All

The US contains 4 million miles of paved roads, turning nature into long, barren stretches of land.

The population of the US, now over 304 million people, has doubled since most of us were kids, and continues to grow by roughly 8,640 people per day. All of those additional souls – coupled with cheap gas, our love affair with the car, and our quest to own ever larger homes – have fueled unprecedented development that continues to sprawl over 2 million additional acres per year (the size of Yellowstone National Park). We have connected all of our developments with four million miles of roads; their paved surface is five times the size of New Jersey.

Somewhere along the way we decided to convert the forests that used to cover our living and working spaces into huge expanses of lawn dotted with a few small, mostly nonnative trees. So far we have planted over 62,500 square miles – some 40 million acres – in lawn. Each weekend we mow an area eight times the size of New Jersey to within an inch of the soil and then congratulate ourselves on a job well done.

And it’s not as if those little woodlots and “open spaces” that we have not paved over are pristine. Nearly all are second-growth forests that have been thoroughly invaded by alien plants like autumn olive, multiflora rose, bush honeysuckle, privet, Oriental bittersweet, buckthorn, and Japanese honeysuckle. More than 3,400 species of alien plants have invaded over 200 million acres of the US.

Ornamental species become invasive as they spread unchecked, like this tangle of oriental bittersweet, multiflora rose, Japanese honeysuckle and autumn olive.

To nature lovers, these are horrifying statistics. I stress them so that we can clearly understand the challenge before us. We have turned 54 percent of the lower 48 states into a suburban/urban matrix, and 41 percent more into various forms of agriculture.

That’s right: We humans have taken 95 percent of nature and made it unnatural.

But does this matter? Are there consequences to turning so much land into the park-like settings humans enjoy? Absolutely, both for biodiversity and for us. Our fellow creatures need food and shelter to survive and reproduce, and in too many places we have eliminated both. State Natural Heritage Centers have estimated that as many as 33,000 species of plants and animals in the US are now imperiled – too rare to perform their role in their ecosystem. These species can be considered functionally extinct. The songbirds that brighten spring mornings have been in decline since the 1960s, having lost 40 percent of their numbers so far. One hundred twenty-seven species of neotropical migrants are in steep decline. In fact, a survey of our nation’s bird populations, commissioned by former President Bush, has found that one-third of our nation’s birds are endangered.

Why We Need Biodiversity

Nonnative ornamentals like the Asian azalea in this yard cannot support the nutritional and lifecycle needs of our native insect species.

For most of us, hearing such numbers triggers only a passing sadness; few people feel personally threatened by the loss of biodiversity. Here’s why you should. Biodiversity losses are a clear sign that our own life-support

systems are failing. The ecosystems that support us – that determine the carrying capacity of the earth and our local spaces – are run by biodiversity. It is biodiversity that generates oxygen and cleans water, creates topsoil out of rock, buffers extreme weather events like droughts and floods, pollinates our crops, and recycles the mountains of garbage we create every day.

And now, with human-induced climate change threatening the planet, it is biodiversity that, if given half a chance, will suck that carbon out of the air and sequester it in living plants. Humans cannot live as if they are the only species on this planet. Why? Because it is other species that create the ecosystem services that are so essential to us. Every time we force a species to extinction, we are encouraging our own demise. Despite the disdain with which we have treated it in the past, biodiversity is not optional.

Parks Are Not Enough

Neotropical migrants like the wood thrush are especially hard-hit by habitat loss.

I am often asked why the habitats we have preserved within our park system are not enough to save most species from extinction. Years of research by evolutionary biologists have shown that the area required to sustain biodiversity is pretty much the same as the area required to generate it in the first place. The consequence of this simple relationship is profound. Since we have taken 95 percent of the US from nature, we can expect to lose 95 percent of the species that once lived here unless we learn how to share our living, working, and agricultural spaces with biodiversity. Ninety-five percent of all plants and animals! Now there is a statistic that puts climate-change predictions of extinction to shame.

And studies of habitat islands with known histories, such as Barro Colorado Island in the Panama Canal and Ashdown Forest in England, suggest that these predictions are accurate. Species are lost in the same proportion in which a habitat is reduced in size. The good news is that extinction takes a while, so if we start sharing our landscapes with other living things soon, we should be able to save much of the biodiversity that still exists.

Redesigning Suburbia

What will it take to give our local animals what they need to survive and reproduce on our properties? Native plants, and lots of them. This is a scientific fact deduced from thousands of studies about how energy moves through food webs.

Here is the general reasoning: All animals get their energy directly from plants, or by eating something that has already eaten a plant. Insects are the group of animals most responsible for passing energy from plants to the animals that can’t eat plants. This fact is what makes insects such vital components of healthy ecosystems. So many animals depend on insects for food (e.g., spiders, reptiles, amphibians, rodents, and 96 percent of all terrestrial birds) that removing insects from an ecosystem spells its doom.

Diverse native gardens like this one provide support for many native species that cannot survive on nonnative plants.

But that is exactly what we have tried to do in our suburban landscapes. For over a century we have favored ornamental landscape plants from China and Europe over those that evolved right here. If all plants supported wildlife equally, that would be fine. But every plant species protects its leaves with a mixture of nasty chemicals that makes them distasteful at best, and downright toxic at worst. With few exceptions, only insect species that have shared a long evolutionary history with a particular plant lineage have developed the physiological adaptations required to disarm the chemical defenses in their host’s leaves. They have developed over time to eat only the plants with those particular chemicals.

When we present insects from Pennsylvania, for example, with plants that evolved on another continent, chances are those insects will be unable to eat them. We used to think this was good. Kill all insects before they eat our plants! But a plant that cannot pass on the energy it has harnessed cannot fulfill its role in the food web.

We have planted Kousa dogwood, a species from China that supports only a few insect herbivores, instead of our native flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), which supports 117 species of moths and butterflies alone. In hundreds of thousands of acres, we have planted goldenraintrees, ginkgos, and dawn redwoods from China instead of one of our beautiful native oaks, and in doing so we have lost the chance to grow and support 534 species of caterpillars, all of them nutritious bird food. My research has shown that alien ornamentals support 29 times fewer animals than do native ornamentals.

Plants Matter

Even the clear dagger moth caterpillar, which can feed off of many species, cannot digest nonnative plants.

In the past we have ignored the vital role plants play in our landscapes. Plants, of course, are the only organisms that capture energy from the sun and turn it into the simple sugars and carbohydrates: the food that supports nearly all the food webs on earth. Every time we bulldoze a native plant community, we are reducing the amount of food available for our fellow creatures. In fact, the amount of life that can exist in an area is directly proportional to the amount of vegetation in that area. Because plants have physical structure, they also provide housing for animals.

We can no longer landscape with aesthetics as our only goal. We must also consider the function of our landscapes if we hope to avoid a mass extinction that we ourselves are not likely to survive. As quickly as possible, we need to triple the number of native trees in our lawns and underplant them with the understory and shrub layers absent from most managed landscapes. Homeowners can do this by planting the borders of their properties with native trees such as white oaks (Quercus alba), black willows (Salix nigra), red maples (Acer rubrum), green ashes (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), black walnuts (Juglans nigra), river birches (Betula nigra), and shagbark hickories (Carya ovata).

Those trees should be underplanted with woodies like serviceberry (Amelanchier canadensis), bottlebrush buckeye (Aesculus parviflora), arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum), hazelnut (Corylus americanus), and blueberries (Vaccinium spp).

Studies have shown that even modest increases in the native plant cover on suburban properties raise the number and species of breeding birds, including birds of conservation concern. As gardeners and stewards of our land, we have never been so empowered to help save biodiversity from extinction, and the need to do so has never been so great. All we need to do is plant native plants!

Douglas Tallamy is professor and chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology at the University of Delaware.


Certain native staples are essential to any forest restoration within the suburban/urban matrix:

• New England: Sugar maple, white pine, and paper birch

• Mid-Atlantic: White oak, American beech, river birch, and red maple

• Midwest: Bur oak, honeylocust, and crabapple

• Deep South: Live oak, loblolly pine, and tupelo

• Northwest: Douglas-fir, yellow cedar, and beaked hazelnut

However, diversity is the real key to restoring native plant communities.

In New England, for example, consider replacing Norway spruce with Atlantic white cedar, or northern white cedar underplanted with native hawthorns and alternate-leaf dogwood. These plants produce abundant bird food in the form of insects and berries.

In mid-Atlantic states, sycamore is valuable in riparian restorations and biological corridors through suburban backyards, despite its susceptibility to early season anthracnose. Also consider one of the hickories – shagbark for rich, welldrained soils, and pignut, shellbark, or mockernut for upland plantings. The conifer conundrum in the mid-Atlantic states can usually be solved with eastern redcedar, a wonderful evergreen that can be an accent plant anchoring a suburban home, an effective, fast-growing screen, or a formal alley bordering a long driveway.

The Paper Birch is a member of a family of trees capable of supporting an impressive 413 species of butterfly and moth caterpillars.

Midwest oak-savannah ecosystems can benefit from adding understory plantings of bottlebrush buckeye, rough dogwood, pawpaw, and wafer ash. Wafer ash, incidentally, is the primary host for the giant swallowtail butterfly, while pawpaw is the sole host for zebra swallowtails. And disease-resistant American elms are now available for urban restorations east of the Mississippi.

In the Deep South and Southeast, sourwood, the southern sugar maple, and water oak are valuable additions to native plant communities, as well as abundant groupings of native azaleas like pinxterbloom, flame, and pinkshell azaleas. We hope that we can soon liberally plant disease-resistant American chestnuts in the piedmont and mountainous regions of the South as well.

In drier areas of the Pacific Northwest, consider adding Garry oak and western hemlock to street and riparian plantings, underplanted with Pacific dogwood, blue elderberry, and moosewood viburnum when appropriate.

This article was published in the Autumn 2009 issue of American Forests magazine.


  1. Liz Gardner January 23, 2013 at 9:01 pm - Reply

    Your book, Bringing Nature Home, sits on my quick-reach bookshelf stuffed with bookmarks. While researching the whitebark pine and tundra plant communities on it was thrilling it was to click open this link and see that you were the author. Great work, keep writing! Thank you for what you are doing.

  2. Michael March 12, 2013 at 8:55 pm - Reply

    Finally, we start to open our eyes about this impending problem. This article does in fact make very good points about conservation and regeneration of our native enviornment. Eventually with all the developments with new homes, gas stations and businesses the earth will eventually look grey because of all the development, course that may take time, but at the rate we are going maybe not so much as we think. Take away our natural enviornments and everyone suffers, plants, animals and us humans, we are all from the earth and if we keep killing our earth we will kill ourselves eventually or make our life style extremely unhealthy. So in my opinion, if you dont want a whole forest in your backyard, as this article says, at least plant one tree,they dont hurt, they in fact help even if it is just one tree planted in your yard.

  3. Laura Thomas March 17, 2013 at 10:24 am - Reply

    Thank-you. Just thank-you.

  4. Regina Renner March 21, 2013 at 10:39 am - Reply

    This is a fantastic article. On a positive note, planting native species is getting more and more common here in Minnesota. People are learning about the beauty and wonder of restoring native plants and creating corridors for insects, birds and other wildlife.

  5. Lynn Koch March 22, 2013 at 3:47 pm - Reply

    This is a wonderful article. I’ve been engaged (last Spring, Summer, early Autumn) in creating a bird garden in my back yard. Lots of work, lots of fun. Sadly, the people who are moving into my neighborhood are taking down small houses, trees, etc. and building huge houses which don’t allow for trees, just small plants and cement around these houses. Not only ugly but destroying the biodiversity which used to exist.

  6. Barbara March 22, 2013 at 6:20 pm - Reply

    This should be required reading. It needs to spread to everyone’s backyard and beyond!

  7. Carole March 22, 2013 at 10:38 pm - Reply

    Great article. Would love to know the reasoning behind choosing loblolly pine over long-leaf pine for the south. At one time there were 90 million acres and it was the dominate tree.

    • Michelle Werts March 25, 2013 at 9:34 am - Reply

      Hi, Carole,

      We recently talked about the loss of longleaf in the Southeast on our blog:

      As Josh discusses in his post, one of the reasons had to do with loblolly being a cheap, easy replacement for longleaf for logging purposes.

      Our Global ReLeaf program has conducted many projects over the years to help restore longleaf to the Southeast. In 2013, we’re helping plant more than 400,000 longleafs in Florida:


      • Tom February 20, 2015 at 9:56 am - Reply

        Love the longleaf. There’s one (25′)in a neighbor’s frontyard way out of range 50 miles north of NYC in the Hudson Valley. Always glance at it – reminds me of home. I lived in NC loblolly country near Durham and it’s also a worthy tree I grew to admire but not a substitute for longleaf.

  8. Cecile Chollet March 23, 2013 at 3:32 pm - Reply

    It’s been a real challenge to try to educate some “neighbors” about my not having a lawn in front or back but flowers and herbs in front and a food garden in back. One immediately beside is very OC about having a “weedless” lawn and no trees. Fortunately, other like what I’ve done and one has even regularly supplied me with rootings from her backyard garden. Thanks for the list of riparian trees for mid-Atlantic. There’s a slope along the back line which in heavy rain can turn to a stream. I’ve been wondering what to put back there to slow down the flow.

  9. Michael Bowles April 15, 2013 at 12:15 pm - Reply

    Thank you for a great article. We should get rid of all the bush hogs, lawn mowers and weed eaters that do nothing more than destroy and burn fossil fuels and waste a ton of money. Keep up the good work and thank you again.

  10. eva van dyke April 2, 2014 at 11:35 am - Reply

    i’m a wildlife gardener. i planted 52 understory trees in addition to the existing 27 cedar elms and oaks on our 3/4 acre suburban lot, to provide food and cover year round. when i garden with the kids at school, i tell them that i chose my plants according to who eats them. thank you for the amazing read. sharing. best, eva

  11. Robin Ashe April 2, 2014 at 8:47 pm - Reply

    Thank you so much for this article and pointing out that WE are at least partially responsible for the decline in the wild bid population. I’m so tired of hearing people blame it all on feral/outdoor cats. Someone said in regards to birds and feral cats that we’re using the cats as scapegoats because we can’t admit we might be at fault.

  12. Laurel K April 3, 2014 at 9:04 am - Reply

    Most of the folks reading this are already clued in. It is the local policymakers and planners that need to learn, understand, and enforce this information. Please do what you can to inform those in these positions in the community. Maybe forward this link to your city council.

  13. Barbara Buffington April 7, 2014 at 9:43 pm - Reply

    Enjoyed your article so much. But I was also shocked by the stats. We have an upcoming sale of native plants in Atlanta at the Chattahoochee Nature Center. I certainly plan to explore the sale. Thanks for making me more aware.

  14. Pat April 18, 2014 at 12:37 pm - Reply

    Going beyond trees, we must look at all our native plants & flowers! All of our pollinators are in peril! from the humble honey bee, to bumble, monarch butterfly, bats,and on and on. Our lawns were not meant to be golf courses, there are plenty of those too. We must refrain from all the chemicals used in the environment and food!!!!!

  15. Peter LaRochelle October 5, 2014 at 2:11 am - Reply

    I found your site while trying desperately to find a recipe for the kousa dogwood fruit for wine as I found abundant fruit on Penn Tech college campus in Williamsport PA but despite an apparent lie on Wikipedia repeated religiously by plagiaristic authors, I can’t find a single recipe for wine making and I noticed that though the fruit was delicious, not even squirrels would touch it, only fruit flies. Why there isn’t a single apple tree on campus but dozens of invasive species no one recognized or would eat if they did, I can’t understand. Sharing your page.

  16. andy October 24, 2014 at 8:10 pm - Reply

    Well said! I have a acre lot going natural. The biodiversity is amazing to see.

  17. Oscar November 26, 2014 at 2:06 pm - Reply

    I appreciate the article, but your statistic that 95% of the US’s land area is turned unnatural is impossible. Although you were correct in that 45% of the US is agricultural land, your estimation that 54% of the US is suburban / urban matrix is impossible. Estimations are that 3% of the US is built up. Even if we dramatically increase this figure to 5%, ensuring all suburban areas and roads are covered, we come nowhere near the 95% figure. A best estimate would be that the US is 50%-50% natural / unnatural. However, the need to change our backyards to increase biodiversity is definitely true and well appreciated.

  18. Elaine February 17, 2015 at 11:02 am - Reply

    FANTASTIC ARTICLE. On the same note as RobinAsh, seeing all the roadsides/lots with mowed lawn and manicured liriope, where once was milkweed, helps to also explain a large part of the monarch decline. It is not just chemicals, which people use as a scapegoat. Chemicals, and feral cats, ARE bad for wildlife, but our lack of native plants is probably the biggest reason.

  19. Matt Smith April 19, 2015 at 7:04 pm - Reply

    How can I convince my neighbors? I’m the only one on my block planting native trees and shrubs on my quarter-acre suburban lot. I’m the only one with half my front yard covered in leaf litter year-round. Everyone has lawns, exotic specimen trees, non-native hedge bushes, and colorful annual flower beds. They pay for landscaping crews to bag up and cart away their leaves. My neighbor pays for a service to send a guy with a plastic tub of colored liquid and a spray pump to walk around their yard squirting what I presume is poison. I walk into big box nursery stores and I see tropical-looking exotic plants. I walk into grocery stores and I see shelves of lawn fertilizers and lawn chemicals. I go to the checkout line and I see gardening magazines with rose bushes, lawn furniture, and hardscapes. What do I do? It feels like I’m the only one trying to bring nature home sometimes.

  20. Lisa K. May 17, 2015 at 7:47 pm - Reply

    This article is so true. Suburban sprawl is killing off native plants and developers are tearing down precious wooded areas, destroying important habitat for wildlife. Humans should stop being so selfish and start caring more about other species on this planet.

  21. Inge Buchanan June 10, 2015 at 4:35 am - Reply

    I live in Sydney, Australia and wish we had a book like “Bringing Nature Home” which deals with our native plants and animals.
    Thank You so much for the book and this article.

  22. Reeja Jacob October 18, 2015 at 11:47 am - Reply

    This article is really good and very informative.

  23. Ernesto April 11, 2016 at 9:03 am - Reply

    Hello there! Your websites are loading slow for my situation,
    it took like a minute to reload, I actually do not know
    whether it’s just me or maybe your blog however
    google loaded fine for me. Nevertheless, Thank you
    for posting such a impressive articles. I’m assuming it really
    has been helpful to a lot of people . This is without a doubt incredibly
    good what you have concluded and want to discover amazing
    posts from you. Immediately after viewing the post, I have
    book marked your webblog.

Leave A Comment