Home
| Products & Publications | American Forests Magazine | Archives | Winter 2001 | Articles
By
Chris Bolgiano
It could have been a scene from long ago: A team of silky
chestnut horses with feet as big as buckets slobbered quietly
as men in red-checkered shirts unloaded gear. Suddenly the
buzz of
chain saws broke the morning silence in this western Virginia
woodlot. This was no romantic replay of the past, but a contemporary
crew of "biological woodsmen" making a living in today's forests.
"Logging with draft animals is not a matter of nostalgia,"
says Jason Rutledge, crew boss and a national leader in defining
the terms and the practice of a newly revised tradition. "It's
simply the best solution to many current forest problems."
|
WANT
TO KNOW MORE?
|
|
Plans
for the horse logging arch (cost is $20
to $25 but free with membership in the organizations
below), and information about horse logging
in general, can be obtained from:
Jason
Rutledge, President, Healing Harvest Forest
Foundation, 8014 Bear Ridge Rd., Copper
Hill, VA 24079; 540/651-6355; (fax) 540-651-3914;
(e-mail) rutledge@swva.net.
Glenn
French, President, North American Horse
and Mule Loggers Association, 8307 Salmon
River Hwy., Otis, OR 97368; 541/994-9765;
(e-mail) gfrench@centurytel.net
|
|
|
Agreement is widespread and growing. A recent Internet search
on "horse logging" yielded not only home pages for horse loggers
from Nova Scotia to Texas to Oregon but also help wanted ads
from landowners seeking horse loggers across that same continental
span. There were landowner guidelines for writing horse logging
contracts, feature stories in various papers on local horse
loggers, a directory of horse loggers compiled by Rural Heritage
magazine, and the Draft Horse Resource support site, with
a chat room where you are disqualified for "cussing or slapping
the reins."
What is bringing this old-fashioned art back to the forefront?
Ironically, it is modern life. As private forestland gets
divided into smaller and smaller chunks, the reduced tract
size leads to increasing forest fragmentation. And owners
of those tracts are more environmentally savvy.
"The immediate attraction of skidding with horses, mules,
or oxen," says Rutledge, "is its low environmental impact."
The process of skidding--hauling the tree from where it is
cut to where it is loaded onto a truck--causes much of the
havoc associated with logging, including damaging standing
trees and digging deep ruts in the ground.
Injured trees diminish the wood's future value, and erosion
from logging roads and skid trails contributes heavily to
sedimentation of rural streams. As Rutledge murmurs a command
and his team of horses leans into the weight of three poplar
logs, I measure the ruts they leave: exactly 1.5 inches deep,
significantly less than a mechanical skidder. Although the
crew has been working here for weeks, very few trees show
any damage from passing logs.
By comparison, a 1995 study by University of Missouri researchers
found that mechanized skidders, which are much heavier and
less maneuverable than horses, require wider trails, leave
deeper ruts, compact the surrounding soil significantly more,
and wound many more residual trees. Plus they're noisy, smoky,
and reek of diesel fuel instead of hay-filled barns.
However, Rutledge cautions that, "horse logging can also
be environmentally damaging, depending on how the logger operates."
One issue: the matter of technique--how logs are hitched to
the animals. After years of research, Rutledge adopted a horse
logging arch developed by old-time horse logger Charlie Fisher
in Andover, Ohio. The arch, a metal bar cantilevered 14 degrees
forward in front of the axle's center line, hoists each log
high enough to avoid gouging the ground as it slides forward
(see sidebar).
Another issue is philosophical. Past methods of harvesting,
particularly high-grading, in which only the valuable trees
are removed, have left poor-quality timberlands across much
of the country.
Although he discourages the practice, Rutledge warns that
"horse loggers can high grade just like conventional loggers."
Instead, he advocates "low-grading": cutting the worst trees
first, trees individually selected through a matrix of indicators
he calls "nature's tree marking paint"--frost cracks, crown
damage, presence of certain fungi, and other signs of disease
or injury. Research has shown that trees remaining after a
thinning can grow two to three times more rapidly than before,
adding considerably to their value for the next harvest cycle,
which Rutledge figures in 10- to 20-year intervals.
In the meantime, the forest remains essentially intact.
"In the mixed eastern hardwoods where I work, I leave about
70 percent of the canopy, plus obvious wildlife features like
snags," Rutledge says. "That leaves plenty of diverse habitat
and admits some sunlight to the forest floor for natural regeneration
from seedlings, but prevents epicormic branching" (undesirable
branches stimulated by sun).
In the more densely shaded conifer woodlands of Oregon,
Glenn French, president of the North American Horse and Mule
Loggers Association, aims for 50 percent canopy retention.
"I want sunlight to reach the lower green branches of the
remaining trees to stimulate tree growth, but I don't want
an opening big enough to allow wind to blow them over," he
says.
Like Rutledge and most other horse loggers, French cuts
mainly on small, privately owned woodlots. "The landowners
that hire me are more concerned with the damage I won't do
than with the money they won't earn," he said. "That's the
trade-off with horse logging--it's slow and low production,
and therefore brings in less income over a given period of
time."
The literature on horse logging averages production at 1,000
to 3,000 board-feet a day, depending on topography (horses
can handle most landscapes except very steep slopes and rocky
ground), skidding distances, type and condition of trees,
and size of crew. A recent survey in Alabama, where an estimated
50 or so horse loggers operate, found that most crews consisted
of three people or less, usually family members. Logs were
loaded on a side-loading truck and driven to the mill at the
end of the day. "Day after day," says Mark DuBois, who helped
direct the survey as Extension forester and assistant professor
at Auburn University, "each of these loggers is producing
an average of 6,500 tons, approximately 2,600 cords of wood
per year."
Markets are wildly variable, but if a mill pays an average
of 30 cents a board-foot, for example, on less-than-best eastern
hardwoods, then 30 acres of those trees at 1,500 board-feet
an acre could net $13,500.
It's common practice for mechanized loggers to take about
half what the mill pays while the landowner gets the rest
(if no forestry consultant is involved, which is often the
case). Horse loggers, however, generally require about 70
percent of mill receipts in order to provide a living wage
over the longer time span needed to harvest.
So landowners see less immediate cash, but they also see
a continuously functioning forest that is gaining future value.
The most valuable trees remain to grow higher-quality lumber
at a faster rate, and wildlife habitat, water quality, and
scenic values remain at high levels.
There are other, less visible values. More money stays in
the local community, because horse loggers do not send off
huge payments on equipment. One researcher noted that a horse
can be maintained for a year for less than the cost of one
mechanical skidder tire. Locally grown hay powers the four-legged
skidders instead of fossil fuels.
And as Jason Rutledge points out, "You just don't go out
to the barn one morning and find a baby skidder."
And although horse-logged lumber currently accounts for
a tiny percentage of the wood products mainstream, the practice's
resurgence is not altogether welcomed by the conventional
logging establishment.
"There's a segment that fears horse logging will replace
all mechanized logging," says Mark DuBois of his Alabama experience.
That's hardly likely, especially on high-volume operations
such as industrial pine plantations. But horse logging may
be poised for a promising future.
The well-established trend in private forestland toward
fragmentation and smaller tract size, combined with rising
environmental concern and landowner knowledge, is challenging
business as usual.
Fewer landowners are willing to incur the massive change
to their forest imposed by clearcutting or the annoyance and
risk of damage associated with heavy equipment.
A few public land managers have also utilized horse loggers;
in the West, especially, there is growing interest in using
them to reduce fuel loads in heavily visited tourist areas
where forest aesthetics are crucial.
The Canadian province of British Columbia, where the provincial
government owns 94 percent of the land, seems to be the first
place in North America where governmental policies actually
promote horse logging. After the Quesnel Forest District began
to set aside small areas for horse logging only, an analysis
found that the number of families supported by full-time horse
logging increased from eight in 1984 to 20 in 1998.
"We are now committed to offering 15,000 cubic meters a
year [about 4.3 million board-feet] for 10 to 15 years to
horse loggers," said David Zirnhelt, who served as Minister
of Forests from 1996 to February 2000 and was a founding member
of the regional Cariboo Horse Loggers Association. Twenty-five
hundred cubic meters (about 718,000 board-feet) will keep
one full-time horse logger busy for a year; many of the horse
loggers are part-time farmers.
Rob Borsato, the current association president, feels that
"the long-term nature of this commitment by the government
will make a huge difference in attracting people into horse
logging."
The biggest problem with horse logging, in fact, may be
finding people to do it. Surveys in Alabama and elsewhere
indicate that the demand for horse loggers already far outpaces
the supply. Estimates of the number of horse loggers in the
United States range from 2,000 to 10,000, many of whom learned
the trade from their fathers or grandfathers, and many of
whom are nearing retirement age. Videos and manuals are available,
but it's a difficult occupation to learn without experienced
guidance. Jason Rutledge founded the Healing Harvest Forest
Foundation in part to address that need through a student
earn-as-you-learn program. He also plans to establish a formal
apprenticeship system; one of his many students was working
with him when I visited.
Workshops are held by several organizations around the country,
and in the Canadian province of Ontario, Sir Sandford Fleming
College offers a month-long field-based curriculum that includes
silviculture, safety, and "equine technology."
For those who scoff at the power of equine technology to
get the job done, remember that until the early 1900s, when
steam-powered equipment began to replace them, draft animals
hauled out nearly every virgin tree across much of this continent.
It may be old technology, but it's tried and proven. AF
Long-time
contributor Chris Bolgiano authored the prize-winning The
Appalachian Forest, A Search for Roots and Renewal (Stackpole
Books 1998). [TOP]
|