Urban Forests Go to the Hill

by Melinda Housholder, Urban Forests Program Director
Airplane

Credit: Yuichi Kosio (Kossy@FINEDAYS)/Flickr

Earlier this month, American Forests joined forces with other members of the Sustainable Urban Forests Coalition (SUFC) and took to Capitol Hill to speak up for urban forests across the country.

As part of the SUFC annual “fly-in,” constituents from all over the country met up in D.C. to talk with their political representatives about their urban forests. Together, we held more than 40 meetings on the Hill, having discussions with staffers and sometimes even the congressional members themselves.

Throughout the fly-in, I went with a constituent from Minnesota to visit four different Minnesota offices. We met with staff from the offices of Congresswoman Bachmann, Congresswoman McCollum, Senator Franken and Senator Klobuchar. While each office provided a slightly different experience, it was encouraging that everyone we met with seemed supportive of urban forests.

So what exactly did we discuss?

As members of SUFC, we went to the Hill to talk about a few key areas of concern for the future of our urban forests.

U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.

Credit: Sankar Govind/Flickr

1)  The Vibrant Cities initiative – This initiative provides 12 recommendations as a “roadmap for action” to creating and sustaining healthy, sustainable, urban forests and building vibrant cities. For more on Vibrant Cities, see my previous blog post.

2)  FY 2013 Interior Appropriations – Since the president’s FY 13 budget was released last month, we took this opportunity to comment on and discuss the funding levels for programs that are extremely important to the future of urban forests. These programs include:

  1. The USDA Forest Service’s Urban & Community Forestry Program, which provides financial and technical assistance to cities and towns as they develop their urban forests.
  2. The Forest Service’s Forest Health Management Program, which is crucial for surveying and monitoring the condition of urban-forest health, including early detection and rapid response to harmful insects and diseases.
  3. The Forest Service’s Research and Development Program, which provides funding for urban-forest research, such as forest structure and effects modeling, urban-watershed conservation and ecosystem service assessment tools (such as i-Tree).
  4. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Urban Waters Federal Partnership, which brings together 11 agencies to support the stewardship and local restoration efforts of urban watersheds.

3)  The 2012 Farm Bill – The Farm Bill is reauthorized every five years and is up for reauthorization this year, so we took this opportunity to highlight the urban forests in the Farm Bill. Did you know that Forest Service programs that are critical for maintaining and developing urban forests are authorized by the Farm Bill?

I was proud to be a part of such an important effort to help raise the awareness of our policy makers about the benefits of urban forests and the importance of funding the programs that are crucial to creating and maintaining sustainable urban forests across the country. I am hopeful that our fly-in day will lead to productive outcomes and furthered support for our urban forests.


Signs of Spring

by Loose Leaf Team

By Michelle Werts

Cherry blossoms in Washington, D.C.

Cherry blossoms in Washington, D.C. Credit: American Forests

Tomorrow’s Spring Equinox officially marks the beginning of a new season, but for many parts of the country, it felt like spring arrived weeks ago. The tree outside my window is already in full bloom, and the gorgeous magnolia I pass on my way to work each morning is already losing its blooms — that’s how warm it’s been in the D.C. area this month. And according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s annual Spring Outlook report, the warm weather is here to stay. Above average temperatures are expected in the Southwest, Great Plains, Great Lakes and East. In a double-edged sword, these warmer temperatures will combine with drier-than-average conditions for many parts of the U.S., which reduces the risk of flooding, but also will extend many areas’ long-running drought conditions.

Here in D.C., the earlier, warmer spring has also had another consequence: It’s messing with the peak bloom of our iconic cherry blossoms — and on their 100th birthday no less! Being highly susceptible to weather patterns that determine when they bloom, this month’s unseasonably warm weather means that the cherry blossoms are already blooming, weeks ahead of schedule. In fact, the National Park Service has amended the forecast for the peak-bloom period multiple times, and now, this week is when the blooms will be at their best — the first week in a six-week festival. With the early bloom, any travelers hoping to see the iconic trees in all their glory in mid-April will be out of luck. And this year’s early bloom might just be an indicator of things to come.

Last fall, the University of Washington published a report stating that the Tidal Basin cherry blossoms were “ideal indicators of the impacts of climate change.” According to their models and research, they estimate that in 40 years, the average bloom period for the blossoms will be two weeks earlier than it is now; in 70 years, it’ll be a full month. So while the calendar may claim that spring begins in mid-March, it looks like climate change might have other plans in store for Mother Nature.


A Biological Clock

by Loose Leaf Team

By Katrina Marland

biological clockHave you ever pulled an all-nighter? If you have, you know that they are nearly always followed by a terrible, dragging fatigue. For the next day, or even several days, you just don’t feel right. That is nature catching up with you. You see, the human body is only meant to function on a 24-hour cycle; some of it active (awake), and some of it dormant (asleep). This is called a circadian rhythm: a biological process that works on a roughly 24-hour cycle. Just about every living thing on Earth shares this cycle, from animals to plants, fungi and even bacteria.

Now, scientists at the University of Edinburgh have pinpointed the genes in plants that regulate their circadian rhythms. They have found that a set of 12 genes and one particular protein work together to help the plant go dormant at night, saving its energy for growth, processing food and other actions that it can only perform during the day when the sun and other conditions are right. Beyond telling the plant when to wake up and when to sleep, the genes and protein make adjustments to the cycle to help the plant change with the seasons, determining when the plant blooms and when it grows.

This discovery is a big step forward in scientists’ ongoing effort to better understand the mechanisms behind plant activity, and what role the circadian rhythm and other functions play in how plants adapt to a changing environment. The knowledge has possible applications in a number of fields, but perhaps most important is helping scientists understand — and possibly even predict — how plants respond to interruptions in their natural cycles. If you have experienced, as many of us have, particularly strange weather patterns lately — here in Washington, D.C., we’ve had 80-degree days in March and our blooms have been out for weeks — it’s easy to see how significant knowledge like that could be.


Pine Tree State Turns 192

by Loose Leaf Team

By Michelle Werts

The Pine Tree State joined the Union on this day 192 years ago, bringing with it 17 million acres of forestland, 32,000 miles of rivers and streams, and 3,500 miles of coastline. Once part of Massachusetts, in 1820, Maine became America’s 23rd state, but its northeast border would be in dispute for another 22 years — war almost broke out between Britain and Canada over the boundary until the Webster-Ashburton Treaty resolved the issue in 1842.

Sunrise on Cadillac Mountain, Acadia National Park, Maine

Sunrise on Cadillac Mountain, Acadia National Park, Maine. Credit: H.I.L.T./Flickr

Known for its rugged cold and equally rugged landscape, Maine’s landscape was shaped by the ice age, with the last glacial retreat leaving behind a picturesque terrain and 2,000 islands along its coast. It’s home to the only national park in New England, Acadia National Park, and one national forest, White Mountain National Forest. Acadia actually means “heaven on Earth” in French, and those standing atop its Cadillac Mountain at sunrise are the first people in the U.S. to usher in each new day.

Speaking of names, when 83 percent of a state’s land is forestland — the highest percentage of any state in the U.S. — can it really be nicknamed anything but the Pine Tree State? During colonial times, its forestland and coast location made Maine a prime shipbuilding locale; its white pines were particularly popular as masts. Today, timber is still an important part of the state’s economy, but it also still relies on the sea, but now, for the food: A record 100 million-plus pounds of lobster were harvested in 2011.

Maine isn’t all business, though as it’s home to recreation activities galore — from beaches and sailing to camping, hunting and fishing to action sports like rock climbing and surfing. The Pine Tree State has a little something to offer everyone, so “Happy Birthday, Maine.” So glad you officially joined us on March 15, 1820.

Moosehead Lake region, Maine

Moosehead Lake region, Maine. Credit: Dana Moos/Flickr

Somesville, Maine

Somesville, Maine. Credit: Lee Coursey/Flickr


Getting to the Root of Water Quality

by Amanda Tai

Participants at the 2012 RVCC annual policy meeting in Vancouver, WA. (Credit: Sustainable Northwest)

Did you know that more than 50 percent of our freshwater supply originates from forests? Trees act as a natural filter as rain lands and passes through the ground into underground aquifers. Last week, I learned a lot about watershed health at the Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition (RVCC) annual policy meeting in Vancouver, Washington. While there were a lot of topics to cover over the span of the three-day meeting, one of the top issues that kept coming up was watershed health and restoration. So what is being done to make sure our water is clean?

For the first time ever, the USDA Forest Service is developing a National Water Strategy comprised of several watershed restoration programs. The biggest component to the new strategy is called the Watershed Condition Framework (WCF), which provides a “comprehensive, long-term program to restore watershed health, riparian ecosystems, fish habitats and soil productivity” (Ziemer 1997). At the RVCC meeting, I learned about the six-step WCF process to restore watershed health from Forest Service experts:

  • Step A: Classify the condition of all 6th-level watersheds (a smaller sub-section of a watershed) in the national forest by using existing data layers, local knowledge, and professional judgment.
  • Step B: Prioritize watersheds for restoration: establish a small set of selected watersheds for targeted improvement equivalent to a 5-year program of work.
  • Step C: Develop watershed restoration action plans that identify comprehensive project-level improvement activities.
  • Step D: Implement integrated suites of projects in select watersheds.
  • Step E: Track restoration accomplishments for performance accountability.
  • Step F: Verify accomplishment of project activities and monitor improvement of watershed and stream conditions.

Other groups are working on water quality issues as well. Organizations like Charity: Water, Water.org and the Clean Water America Alliance are working to get safe drinking water to communities in need. Here at American Forests, we work on watershed health and protection through our Global ReLeaf tree planting projects and as a member of the Clean Water Network (CWN), a national coalition that advocates for the restoration of our clean-water sources: forests, wetlands and watersheds.

Water has an impact on every aspect of our lives. Watershed and water-quality issues are something that everyone, whether you live in a city, town or the country, has a stake in. We depend on clean water to live, and it is an essential element for both environmental and human health. That’s why when we work to improve water quality, it’s important to look at the root of the issue.


Working for Wildlife

by Loose Leaf Team

By Katrina Marland

Yesterday, Michelle wrote about the challenges in defining exactly what makes an animal officially endangered. It’s an important issue because that language can determine whether or not the government invests its resources in trying to save a species by taking conservation action across public lands. Here’s the problem, though: Endangered species are not found exclusively on public lands. They can’t see property lines, and they have no way of knowing that the thousands of people and millions of dollars working to protect them can only do so in certain places. So when they make their homes elsewhere — say on a farm or in a private forest — they put themselves in danger.

A baby bog turtle (Credit: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service)

Now, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Interior are joining forces to address this gap in protection through a partnership called Working Lands for Wildlife. It’s a tag-team sort of program. First, the Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) will determine which at-risk species need the most protection on private land. Then, using $33 million set aside from the Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP), the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) will provide the landowners with resources to protect those species or improve their habitats.

To kick the program off, they are starting with seven species in particular need of protection on private land: New England cottontail, bog turtle, golden-winged warbler, gopher tortoise, greater sage-grouse, lesser prairie-chicken and Southwestern willow flycatcher. Never heard of any of them? Neither had I. But after reading more about them, it seems that they’re in no less danger than the whooping crane or polar bear; you just don’t often see them publicized because so many hide out on private land, not in zoos or national parks.

Greater Sage-Grouse (Credit: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service)

The goal is to help these species as the program works through its inaugural year and add more species as time goes on. It’s understandable that a farmer, forester or anyone who has to manage acres upon acres of land might not be able to set a lot of time and resources aside for protecting one species, but the Working Lands for Wildlife partnership aims to make it easier. All a landowner has to do is enroll in WHIP through their local NRCS office to get the ball rolling. Hopefully, the program will not only be able to stabilize these species and others, but also take an important step towards helping private landowners realize that they can play an important role in preserving the natural biodiversity of their region.

To learn more about what happens when endangered species make their homes on private land, check out the article “Endangered Forest Species” from our most recent issue of American Forests magazine.

 

 


A Significant Dilemma

by Loose Leaf Team

By Michelle Werts

Canada lynx kitten

A Canada lynx kitten, which is a threatened species, has its measurements documented by a wildlife biologist. Credit: James Weliver/USFWS

How do you legally protect something when some of the legal language that is supposed to provide protection is unclear? This is a dilemma that’s been facing the Endangered Species Act in recent years.

As many people are aware, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 provides for the classification, or listing, and protection of endangered and threatened plant and animal species. Currently, 1,200 animal species and 797 plant species are listed. These species are afforded protection under the act from being hunted, captured, collected, etc. Also, under the act, most listed species have recovery plans designed to aid the species’ populations with the goal being that they will eventually be strong enough to be removed from the list. But how does one determine if a species is “endangered” or “threatened”?

For decades, the act has used the following definitions to determine just that:

  • Endangered species: any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range
  • Threatened species: any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range

Significant portion of its range: Such a short phrase, but a hotly contested one. What qualifies as significant — is it determined by the size of the population in proportion to the rest of the range? Does it mean important, as in the species could not survive without the population in this range regardless of the geographical size? No one knows. Hence, the need for further definition.

Green sea turtle hatchling

An endangered green sea turtle hatchling at Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuge in Florida. Credit: Keenan Adams/USFWS

After years of litigation around this tiny phrase, in 2007, the solicitor of the Department of the Interior gave a formal opinion on the definition of this phrase, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), who administers the Endangered Species Act, began using this definition in its listing determinations. Until, two courts rejected aspects of that formal opinion, and it was officially withdrawn in 2011.

So, we still don’t know what significant means. Hopefully, that will soon change. Last week, public comments were due on FWS’ and NOAA’s Draft Policy on Interpretation of the Phrase “Significant Portion of its Range” in the Endangered Species Act’s Definitions of “Endangered Species” and “Threatened Species.Because the Endangered Species List contains many trees and many wildlife species that call our forests home, American Forests weighed in on the interpretation of this difficult phrase by submitting comments, which you can read on our Forests & Wildlife Public Policy page.

Now, FWS and NOAA will review all submitted comments and make changes to their draft policy. Hopefully, in the near future, everyone will know exactly what significant portion of its range means and can use that knowledge to ensure that all of our plants and animals that need protection are getting it.

Interested on reading more about at-risk species? Check out the Winter 2012 Issue of American Forests feature on endangered species in America’s private forests.

Whooping cranes

Endangered juvenile whooping cranes at Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge in Alabama. Credit: Bill Gates/USFWS


A Belated Birthday

by Loose Leaf Team

By Katrina Marland

We’ve been a little extra busy this month, what with new legislation, policy conferences, fascinating scientific discoveries and just keeping up with the world of environmental news overall. But being busy is no good reason to overlook a birthday, so we’re taking a minute today to recognize some states that are another year older.

First up is Nebraska, which claimed its statehood on March 1, 1867. Among the many cool things the Cornhusker State can lay claim to — including being the birthplace of Kool Aid — is Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands, unique because its forests have been hand-planted over the last century or so. In fact, it’s the largest hand-planted forest in the western hemisphere.

Nebraska National Forest, Bessey Ranger District

Next on the list is Ohio, which became a state on March 1, 1803. Ohio’s only national forest is Wayne National Forest, which sprawls over a quarter of a million acres of Appalachian foothills.

Then, we have Florida, a state that for me is synonymous with our National Register of Big Trees because for the last 10 years (with one exception), it has been the home to more champion trees than any other state. The Sunshine State celebrated its statehood on March 3rd. Florida has three national forests — Apalachicola, Osceola and Ocala — all of which merit a visit at any time of year, whether for swimming in summer, hiking in autumn or viewing a variety of rare ecosystems year-round.

Osceola National Forest (Credit: Geoff Gallice)

And lastly, we have Vermont, which entered the Union March 4, 1791. Famous for more than maple syrup, this state his home to Green Mountain National Forest, which boasts many great hiking trails, including the Appalachian National Scenic Trail and the Robert Frost National Recreation Trail, as well as some of the most incredible autumn foliage one could ever hope to see.

Green Mountain National Forest (Credit: Rich Moffitt)


Lions and Lambs

by Loose Leaf Team

By Michelle Werts

U.S. Capitol

Credit: ttarasiuk/Flickr

According to the old English proverb, “March comes in like a lion and goes out like a lamb.” While this phrase is normally used with the weather, here in D.C., “like a lion” applies to something else: lawmaking. Congress is in session, and this month is chockfull of hearings, meetings and advocacy days, which are keeping my policy colleagues very busy.

Last week, American Forests submitted comments on the International Trade Administration’s National Travel and Tourism Strategy, but that was just the start.

This week:

  • Amanda’s in Vancouver, Washington, at the annual Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition policy meeting.
  • As Scott discussed in his post, the Sustainable Urban Forests Coalition is having meetings on Capitol Hill, which our urban forests director Melinda will recap later this month in her regular blog post.
  • American Forests is submitting more comments on strategies and policies.
  • And all of this in the midst of one of our regular board meetings! Busy, busy, busy.

What are these new comments we’re submitting?

In 2009, Congress asked the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Department of the Interior (DOI) to develop a national climate adaptation strategy that would address climate impacts on fish, wildlife, plants and ecosystems. To develop the strategy, the CEQ and DOI assembled a wide range of federal, state and tribal partners, as well as other interested organizations and parties. Under the lead of the co-chairs — the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the New York Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources — the National Fish, Wildlife & Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy was drafted and opened for public comments.

Nez Perce National Historic Trail in Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana

Along the Nez Perce National Historic Trail in Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana. Credit: Roger Peterson/USDA Forest Service

Because forests’ position in the climate-change debate is unique — they are both impacted by and lessen the impacts of climate change — American Forests reviewed the proposed strategy and in our public comments addressed six specific issues, including recommending a more comprehensive approach to habitat conservation and a consideration of how different ecosystems work together and are interconnected. To read our complete comments on the Climate Adaptation Strategy, visit our Forests & Climate Public Policy page.

Later today, we’ll be submitting comments on FWS and NOAA’s Draft Policy on Interpretation of the Phrase “Significant Portion of its Range” in the Endangered Species Act’s Definitions of “Endangered Species” and “Threatened Species.” What a mouthful, right? Curious what it’s about? Come back Monday for the lowdown.

So, if all of this policy work is our lion for the month of March, what’s our lamb? Cherry blossoms, of course. One of the true joys of a D.C. spring, peak bloom is just weeks away!


Going Rural

by Amanda Tai

This week, I’ve travelled across the country to Vancouver, Washington, to attend the Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition (RVCC) annual policy meeting. This will be my third year attending this meeting, and I always seem to leave feeling more connected to the work that I do.

RVCC attendees

2010 RVCC annual meeting attendees Lynn Jungwirth, Shanna Ratner and Jack Shipley. Credit: Sustainable Northwest/Flickr

Working in Washington, D.C., I don’t often get the chance to talk with people who are doing actual on-the-ground work with forests, water and land. That’s what this meeting is about. These people own land and work on ranches. They are out in the woods and watersheds. You can always tell who’s an out-of-towner at this meeting, and I know I stick out like a sore thumb. After all, I am a city gal taking a trip to the woods. I should have packed my flannel shirt.

Monday was a long day of travelling and changing time zones, so when I arrived at the lodge, I found myself going straight to bed. But the next morning, I woke up feeling refreshed. I don’t know if it was being in a new location or that I’m seeing familiar faces from meetings past. Even though I’m still a D.C. outsider, I feel like I belong. That’s what I like about this group. Even though we’re all coming from different backgrounds, we all care about the same things.

That’s the same message I took away from the meeting’s first panel which was comprised of regional foresters from the Northwest. They stressed the importance of RVCC’s conservation work and continuing to look for innovative ideas. Moving forward, they urged us to continue talking about conservation and frame it in a way that makes it as relevant and as important to all Americans as it is to those of us who work directly with the land, water and natural resources. These things matter — and not just in the present or for people that live in rural communities. They’re important for everyone for the unforeseeable future.

I often find myself doing a lot of reflection when I travel. This trip is no different. I find myself thinking about my connection to the land and the people that work to keep that land thriving. It’s certainly a humbling experience to be around people doing such incredible work for rural communities and economies, and I’m looking forward to continuing my conversations with them in the days, weeks and months to come.