It’s break time! Take a 60-second time-out to watch these adorable grizzly bears — and learn about the threat to their food supply and how you can help.
By Lisa Swann
Unless you’ve had your head in the clouds, you know that much of the country is experiencing unusually cold temperatures. Minnesota recently experienced a sub-zero temperature plunge so severe that school was cancelled — a rare occurrence in a state that is no stranger to cold winters. One positive effect of this arctic blast is that it may have killed off a significant tree pest — the emerald ash borer.
Dr. Lee Frelich, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Forest Ecology, is an expert when it comes to Minnesotan forests, including insect mortality in extreme cold.
According to Dr. Frelich, winter mortality for emerald ash borer is temperature-dependent. He says the larvae can supercool to a certain point, but they die if they freeze, and cold tolerance varies among insects.
A recent study for the Forest Service in Minnesota showed that five percent of insects die at zero degrees Farenheit, while 34 percent die at minus 10, 70 percent at minus 20 and 98 percent at minus 30 degrees.
There is variance, as some insects are inside bark close to the ground where they are warmer and more protected, and some are insulated by snow.
However, with prolonged overnight and daytime cold like Minnesota has recently experienced, the insulating effect becomes minimal.
There are some 900 million ash trees in Minnesota, many of which grow in the swamps in the northern part of the state. The question is whether the few insects who do survive the recent cold spell might be more resistant to cold weather which could mean a new generation of more cold-tolerant insects.
The national symbol of the United States: a bird with a six to seven-foot wingspan and the largest nest of any bird in North America. The bald eagle’s majesty has inspired people for generations.
American Forests has worked with the Forest Service since 2007 to restore habitat for bald eagles in several Midwest national forests and we’ve seen efforts there paying off. Fledglings have been observed in Superior National Forest every year since 2007.
Lately, it’s the bald eagles in a different part of the country who are making the news. Throughout December, bald eagles in Utah were dying mysteriously. The symptoms sick eagles were displaying — seizures, head tremors and paralysis — seemed to suggest West Nile virus. But the mosquitoes that spread the illness are not active so late in the year. The eagle deaths were a mystery.
Last week, Utah officials announced that they had identified the cause: It is indeed West Nile virus, but the eagles were contracting it from their consumption of dead eared grebes. Around 20,000 of the grebes have died in the Salt Lake area since November and though they may not have died from West Nile virus themselves, many are still carriers.
But the mystery isn’t solved completely. As recently as this morning, the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Northern Utah, where some of the sick eagles were taken for care, shared via Facebook that a number of questions still surround the deaths. They ask:
- “Why so late in the year after the earliest and coldest cold snap in years?”
- “Are eared grebes truly the culprit — did this species never before known to be affected by West Nile virus suddenly become vulnerable, or are they just a carrier?”
- “We’ve been told that the West Nile virus is only viable in a dead body for two to three days, yet here we are 40+ days into a large grebe die-off and still receiving dead and dying eagles. Is it that the virus lasts longer in a ‘cold/frozen’ (grebe) body? Something until now, never before considered due to West Nile virus being a ‘warm weather disease?’”
The tally is now 40 dead eagles, but the loss is not expected to affect the health of the overall eagle population. Rather, it’s the usual circumstances surrounding the deaths that have wildlife experts puzzled and concerned. As Leslie McFarlane, Utah wildlife disease coordinator, tells Reuters, “This is really kind of undocumented. Eagles have been known to feed on birds infected with West Nile virus but the transmission hasn’t happened on this large of a scale. And the total number of birds we’re talking about is on a grand scale that may not have been seen before.”
Bald eagles were removed from the Endangered Species List in 2007 after a heartening return from the brink. Let’s hope this incident serves to further our knowledge of bald eagle health.
Check out these recent American Forests Global ReLeaf projects that benefit bald eagles:
By Lisa Swann
Rocky Mountain National Park, established in 1915, will begin celebrating its 100th anniversary later this year, so it’s a perfect year to visit. The park was created to showcase the majesty of the Rocky Mountains, with nearly 250,000 acres of the park designated as a wilderness area.
Within two hours of Denver, Colo., the park is accessible with the Trail Ridge Road rising to 12,000 feet and 300 more miles of hiking trails where one might catch a glimpse of elk, mule deer, moose, bighorn sheep, black bears, coyotes, cougars, eagles, hawks and smaller animals. Golden aspen trees are on display in the fall, and in the summer there are myriad wildflowers.
There was early opposition to forming Rocky Mountain National Park in the 1900s from ranchers, cattlemen and miners. However, conservationists prevailed in Congress and helped establish the park. The park has a rich oral and written history including stories of early native peoples, explorers, ranchers, mountaineering, fire ecology and the biology of the native flora and fauna.
One can be sure that in this 100th anniversary year, these oral histories, publications and government reports, artifacts and natural history specimens will be center stage in any visit. Be sure to check with the National Park Service before visiting as some places in the park are still closed due to 2013 flooding.
We just love this photograph by Charles Knowles of an inlet to Idaho’s Payette Lake at sunrise. We all have things to do and places to be, but don’t forget to stop and enjoy the winter. In the words of Robert Frost:
Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.
My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.
He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
The only other sound’s the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.
The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
– Stopping By Woods On A Snowy Evening by Robert Frost
By Lisa Swann
A new study from researchers at the University of Colorado, Boulder shows that younger trees with smoother bark are better at repelling the mountain pine beetle.
The epidemic pine beetle attack has spread across western states since 1996, affecting millions of acres of forest, including those in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
Colorado doctoral student Scott Ferrenberg, who led the study, noted that the mountain pine beetle had a harder time holding on to smooth-bark trees, which have a slippery surface. These tend to be the younger trees in a stand. The findings, published in the journal Functional Ecology, may help land managers decide which trees to cull and which trees can help protect forested areas against the pine beetle.
To test their findings, the researchers placed 22 beetles on a rough patch of bark, then on a smooth patch. After five minutes, 22 beetles held onto the rough bark, but all the beetles had fallen off the smooth bark.
“We found trees that had both textures on the same stem, and when the tree was attacked, it was on the rough surfaces,” Ferrenberg says. “We thought the beetles were either choosing to avoid the smooth surface, or they just couldn’t hang onto it.”
The results — especially when combined with the findings of a second study also recently published by the research team — provide information that may be useful to land managers who are trying to keep public parks and other relatively small forested areas healthy.
The research suggests that when culling properties to resist the mountain pine beetle, land managers should consider cutting down older trees. Fire management usually suggests cutting the small trees, but this may not be the best strategy for defending against the beetle.
Another study published in the journal Oecologia by Humboldt State University in California found that lodgepole and limber pines that survived more mountain pine beetle attacks had more resin ducts than trees that were killed. Generally, younger trees had more resin ducts.
However, another type of pine that is under attack by the mountain pine beetle has little to no ability — at any age — to use the strategy of pushing out resin to flush beetles out. It’s the whitebark pine and it’s an important foundation and keystone species in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem for a number of reasons.
The whitebark pine lives at high elevations where mountain pine beetles were killed by harsh winters until winters started getting warmer. Unlike lodgepole pine, whitebark pine produces little or no resin, leaving it with fewer natural defenses against the beetle. So we’re giving it a boost. American Forests has been placing pheromone patches on healthy whitebark pines to repel the beetles. You can help by donating to our Endangered Western Forests initiative or by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org to learn about opportunities to help attach patches to trees in the Greater Yellowstone area.
Today, 2013 comes to an end. Many have said that 13 is an unlucky number, but 2013 hasn’t been all unlucky. After all, it was the year of our 45 millionth Global ReLeaf tree in the ground, a comeback for Siberian tigers, the launch of our Community ReLeaf program and good news for the Kirtland’s warbler. So, before heading into 2014, we’re taking this last chance to embrace the number 13. Here are the 13 Loose Leaf posts of 2013 that you — our readers — enjoyed the most. Thanks for reading! Please join us again in 2014!
We learned that by protecting just 17 percent of the world’s land, we can preserve 67 percent of plant species.
We celebrated Johnny Appleseed’s birthday with a look at some of the fruit trees American Forests is planting around the world to help communities. We think Johnny would have approved.
A study found that through nitrogen-fixation, forests can help themselves heal faster from agricultural use.
Sometimes you just need a little simplicity. That’s where nature can come in. Or, some beautiful prose. On the birthday of American author and naturalist Henry David Thoreau, we took some time to enjoy both.9. “Tigers’ Welcome Return”
A new report brought tidings of a recovery of tigers in a few key Asian ecosystems, one of which was very familiar to American Forests: the Siberian forests where trees we helped plant a decade ago in “Trees for Tigers” are now maturing.
This year’s Capitol Christmas Tree came from Colville National Forest in northeastern Washington. It’s quite a different tradition from that of the National Christmas Tree, which has been a live tree throughout most of its history ever since American Forests donated the first live tree in ___
Everyone has a favorite tree, but when we posted this homage to an incredible species, it was clear that for many of you, the sugar maple holds that spot.6. “Monarchs on the Mind”
2013 has been a rough year for monarchs and people are taking note.
Everyone loves a national park, and Zion National Park has a lot to love.
Science Advisory Board member Dr. Jerry Franklin sat down with Loose Leaf to discuss what large, old trees provide ecosystems that younger growth just can’t make up for.
Okay, many of you joined us in wishing Zion a happy birthday, but Sequoia National Park — and the world’s largest trees that live within it — seem to have captured even more hearts, at least among readers here on Loose Leaf.
We celebrate animals every day at American Forests, with restoration projects around the world that benefit wildlife by restoring habitat and connecting fragmented habitat. But it’s always nice to take some time out on World Animal Day to reflect on the species we share the forests with.
And the most popular Loose Leaf story of 2013…
1. “Giving Butterflies a Boost” September 11, 2013
…takes us back to the monarchs of Michoacán — and reveals the organized crime that has had a hand in reducing the monarchs’ numbers until the world’s population of fit into an area smaller than four football fields.
Here’s hoping that in 2014 and the years beyond, we’ll see better news for the monarchs, tigers, sugar maples and all the other species that we’re working to protect. But we can do more than just hope — and you can help. We’re planting trees to restore habitat for endangered species, urging Congress to proactively address threats to our forests and providing communities with the tools to help manage their vital urban forests. Please give us a hand.
Throughout December, we’ve enjoyed looking back at the year’s International Society of Arboriculture True Professionals — arborists who go above and beyond the call of duty to bring arboriculture to the community. Rounding out the list of 2013’s True Professionals is Edward Milhous, ISA Certified Arborist and Consultant and Owner of TreesPlease in Haymarket, Va.
“I have an appreciation for the intangible rewards that come from helping people.”
Ed Milhous is a True Professional of Arboriculture who freely gives of his time to support developing arborists in their careers. A long-time supporter of continuing education, Milhous has spent the past quarter-century promoting arboriculture to future professionals by teaching and speaking at various camps, seminars and events in conjunction with the Mid-Altlantic branch of ISA (MAC-ISA). In addition, as the owner of his consulting firm, TreesPlease® in Haymarket, Va., Milhous has enjoyed an outstanding reputation with consumers and arborists for helping people solve their plant problems.
“I take every opportunity to speak to groups about trees, and I believe that has been a factor in building a successful consulting practice,” Milhous contends. “The Day of Arboriculture we present to students in forestry and horticulture at Virginia Tech each year has reached more than 500 students since its inception.
“I know that these MAC-ISA sponsored programs have recruited a significant number of students into arboriculture, and some of them are among our chapter leaders today. Preparing others to take this profession further is of critical importance to me.”
Milhous has left an indelible footprint so far. Among the projects in his body of work is Evans Farm, a development in McLean, Va., where he inventoried more than 400 significant trees on the site for preservation. He’s consulted on several iconic properties in the D.C. area, conducting a complete tree inventory at the U.S. Naval Academy and the Jefferson Memorial, and consulting with the Architect of the Capitol about Capitol Hill trees. Milhous was also part of a team of extension agents and volunteers who organized the first Master Gardener programs in Virginia and Washington, D.C.“We had no resources, but still had to publish our own manual for the program, so each volunteer and each agent wrote a chapter,” Milhous remembers. “Our first class included more than 100 people. Now, 33 years later, we have more than 30,000 volunteers trained in horticulture and they provide more than 100,000 hours of community service each year in Virginia alone. In fact, I still teach a class each year.”
While Milhous works tirelessly to promote education at every level, most of his work is in tree preservation. He does what he can to enable research and teach the public the value of a certified arborist.
“On almost a daily basis, I promote using an ISA Certified Arborist to my clients,” Milhous explains. “I tell them the single-most reliable way to ensure that you get work done properly is to require that the person doing the work is certified. It’s always nice if the salesperson knows what he is doing, but it’s unlikely that he will be the one doing the work. I want the person up in the tree to be certified.”
When asked what it means to be a True Professional of Arboriculture, Milhous believes it is someone who recognizes when there’s a need to learn more and wants to keep on learning. “A True Professional promotes his profession as much as his own business. He wants to bring the competition up to his level rather than just beat them on a bid. A True Professional takes pride in the work done, and would rather walk away from a job than do something that isn’t right.”—Ed Milhous and ISA
Did you miss reading about the other True Professionals of 2013? You can find them all here on Loose Leaf:
By Maria Harwood
This fall, we ventured out into the communities of our five 2013 Community ReLeaf project cities and rolled up our sleeves for some hard work! Thanks to the support of our project partners, Bank of America and the U.S. Forest Service along with 169 local community volunteers, we were able to put 175 trees in the ground, enhancing urban forests across the country.
In addition to the tree plantings, assessments of the urban forests in our project cities were performed to analyze different aspects of the canopy cover and benefits to the local communities realized from investments in urban trees. The results so far speak volumes about the importance of urban forests in our communities:
In Asbury Park, N.J., a coastal city impacted by Hurricane Sandy in 2012, some major trees were lost during the storm, but the overall canopy cover hasn’t suffered a significant change. Tree canopy covers approximately 22 percent of Asbury Park’s 1.5 square miles. The city’s trees provide more than half a million dollars’ worth of benefits annually in filtration of air and water pollution alone. These services also provide a vital link to lessening the impact of stormwater on the city infrastructure following large storms.
Work in Detroit, Mich., was focused in River Rouge Park, the city’s largest park. Collectively, the 1,184-acre park and its 140,000 trees contribute $2.84 million in benefits by filtering air pollution, sequestering carbon and controlling rainwater. If lost, replacing the entire urban forest in this park alone would cost $84 million.
In East Nashville, Tenn., an assessment was conducted looking specifically at the street trees that comprise its urban forest. It was found that these 11,130 trees provide shade for about 12 percent of all the streets and sidewalks. These street trees provide over $1 million in cumulative benefits annually. That is, for every dollar invested in the trees, the community receives $6.91 in benefits.
Pasadena, Calif., also had an analysis conducted on its 58,267 street trees, which provide over $8 million in cumulative benefits each year, including over $1 million in air quality benefits. Overall, the street trees shade around 27 percent of streets and sidewalks.
The assessment in Atlanta, Ga., is still underway, but the report is looking at the urban forests surrounding schools like Price Middle School, where we planted trees in November, to determine the amount of benefit afforded to students from their natural environment.
It’s been a busy year with the kickoff of the Community ReLeaf program in these five cities around the U.S. We have already studied urban canopies and added 175 trees to urban forests around the country, but more work is yet to come! Keep an eye out for the detailed results from each city, coming soon.
While much of the media followed the ever-shifting tea leaves during the budget negotiations between Senator Patty Murray and Representative Paul Ryan, the background tug-of-war over wilderness protections continued this month. Two separate actions, a Senate bill sponsored by Senator John Tester (D-MT) and a statement of policy from the pro-logging group Federal Forest Resource Coalition, highlighted the spectrum of opinion among logging industry, ranchers, outdoor enthusiasts and conservationists.
Sen. Tester’s bill, S. 37 — the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act of 2013, mandates specific amounts of logging on national forest land while designating over 600,000 acres of wilderness. With its compromise between utility of forests and preservation of wild areas, the bill won the support of a variety of different interest groups, including livestock interests and several local wilderness associations. One important juncture in garnering the multi-interest support was the treatment of 20,000 acres in the Snowcrest Mountains that were originally designated as potential wilderness. Following conversations between livestock and wilderness organizations, those 20,000 acres were dropped from consideration. Local ranchers graze cattle on those acres in the summertime and needed access to repair stock tanks and other ranching infrastructure. The acreage will instead be designated a special management area, leaving its wilderness quality while allowing ranchers much-needed access. That compromise gained S. 37 support from otherwise opposing factions, with an additional amendment to allow snowmobile access to Mt. Jefferson winning the isolated praise of fellow western Senator Jim Risch (R-ID).
With its compromises and amendments, the bill passed out of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last week and heads to the Senate floor in the new year. It will, however, face stiff headwinds from Republican senators who believe it does not do enough to promote timber harvests. The bill is also opposed by some Montana conservation groups due to the original proposed 677,000 acres of wilderness dropping to about 640,000. Even should S. 37 be passed by the Senate, it will have a tough time passing through the House of Representatives, with the Republican-controlled body generally opposed to wilderness protection bills.
Yet for all of the imperfections of S. 37, depending on your point of view, it is a working demonstration that compromise is possible between even longtime opposing groups. The other side of the coin is the recent policy statement released by the Federal Forest Resource Coalition (“Coalition”). The Coalition is a trade group that represents 650 wood products companies, so access to forests for logging is a high priority for many of the group’s members. According to the Coalition’s policy statement, 28 percent of national forest lands are suitable for logging. Congress should designate no new wilderness until the management of those national forest acres reflect priority for timber production. In addition to shifting the focus of that 28 percent of forests, the Coalition also pushes for a streamlined environmental review process under — yes, it is back — the National Environmental Policy Act. The policy statement also pushes for wilderness areas to not: be oddly shaped or isolated tracts, be in Alaska or block access to logging areas. And any proposed new designations should have to carry the support of the local House delegation and both senators.
It seems unnecessary to state that conservation groups think the Coalition’s statement is less that of policy and more a list of demands. But here is the take-away: It’s easy for parties on either side of this issue to publish a policy statement, which conveniently avoids the unnecessary burden of compromise required to enact legislation.
Policy statements from all interest groups are designed specifically to shift political thought while it is legislation that actually creates the policy. Policy statements can be as strident as groups wish them to be, but it is compromise, demonstrated by S. 37 and the ultimate Murray-Ryan budget plan, that actually moves policy forward.